"For Sweden" (rallybeetle)
03/13/2014 at 16:37 • Filed to: Planelopnik, Safety | 1 | 11 |
"We haven't ruled out terrorism" means just that. It doesn't mean "we know it was terrorism and are ignoring all other possibilities."
RacecaR
> For Sweden
03/13/2014 at 16:44 | 1 |
"We haven't ruled out terrorism" means just that. It doesn't mean "we know it was terrorism and are ignoring all other possibilities."
It does to the mass media...LEARN MORE TONIGHT AT 11!!!
With-a-G is back to not having anything written after his username
> For Sweden
03/13/2014 at 16:48 | 0 |
So what you're saying is....
> For Sweden
03/13/2014 at 16:55 | 1 |
Roberto G.
> For Sweden
03/13/2014 at 16:57 | 0 |
I hope it's not going to pop out some day, painted this way...
Mercedes Streeter
> For Sweden
03/13/2014 at 17:39 | 1 |
FWIW - Officials said the same about Air France 447 and that turned out to be gross pilot error (after instrument error).
For Sweden
> Mercedes Streeter
03/13/2014 at 17:40 | 1 |
That doesn't take anything away from my point.
f86sabre
> For Sweden
03/13/2014 at 18:06 | 1 |
To speculate in any way about this one is pointless. There is just no evidence to go off of.
For Sweden
> f86sabre
03/13/2014 at 18:07 | 0 |
Which is why no reasonable theory has been ruled out.
I tell people that, but the reporters just keep calling...
Mercedes Streeter
> For Sweden
03/13/2014 at 18:16 | 0 |
I know, just adding that in there. Still wonder what the heck's happened to the plane. Nobody's owned up to terrorism (yet), and obviously the plane tracked far off course over land or water before meeting its ultimate demise.
Seeing how much media attention it's getting, it would definitely make a bold statement for a terrorist organization...
f86sabre
> For Sweden
03/13/2014 at 18:19 | 1 |
The fact that there is so little known is what is mind blowing, even for folks who understand how transoceanic flight works.
user314
>
03/15/2014 at 09:48 | 0 |